Re: The CIECAM challenge in ColorSync
Re: The CIECAM challenge in ColorSync
- Subject: Re: The CIECAM challenge in ColorSync
- From: email@hidden
- Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 22:04:46 EST
|
David,
Not that I'm aware of (and I've been involved with ICC since before the
beginning). First of all, CIECAM is public. Second, ICC is not in the business
of adopting a company's particular implementation of a technology. Third, ICC is
just a profile format...
<<As I understand it, Canon presented their materials to the ICC
first, and the
ICC decided not to adopt it>>
This is not necessarily the case, CIECAM is open:
<<What that means at this point is that there will be no
open-standards method to institute the same features without tripping over
rights that vest in Canon/Microsoft, so that, short of licensing from
Microsoft
(perhaps not a palatable idea for Apple) there is no way to
institute a truely
compatible solution for the advanced features at the OS
level on the Mac. >>
Thanks,
Eric Walowit
Tahoe
|
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden