Re: The CIECAM challenge in ColorSync
Re: The CIECAM challenge in ColorSync
- Subject: Re: The CIECAM challenge in ColorSync
- From: Graeme Gill <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 15:02:31 +1100
email@hidden wrote:
CIECAM is just one appearance model. There are others, some published
some not. Some that I have evaluated far outperform CIECAM and in many
ways are simpler. You can enthusiastically embrace appearance without
embracing CIECAM.
Easy to claim that without proof, but the CIECAM02 has actually
been peer reviewed, and tested against several combined data sets, and is
seen to be the current best fitting model. I'm not aware that any other
published appearance models have been proven to be superior to CIECAM02
(although several seem to be no worse - the statistics makes evaluation rather
inconclusive at times). Unknown appearance models (even if they "far outperform"
CIECAM02), are fairly useless as a basis for industry standards....
Graeme Gill.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden