Re: Profile compression
Re: Profile compression
- Subject: Re: Profile compression
- From: Tom Beckenham <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2006 20:28:58 +1100
- Organization: Quickcut Adstream
Thanks Graeme for your feedback.
As was pointed out by "someone" else, there is a lot we can do with the
design of this system. We have very experienced people already in
database and networking that are working on this system, and thousands
of operators worldwide using it on all sorts of environments. I won't
even go into what we had to do to work around firewall issues in some of
these large organisations. That alone has limited a lot of what we could
do to make it more dynamic or efficient. The synchronisation system
works quite well after the first synchronise, but there is still lots we
can do to make it better and we have great people working on it. I'm not
looking at a way to bypass good software design! I'm being quite open
about this mechanism on a public list, but I really just thought this
was an interesting problem, and wonder if its ever been looked at for
ICC profiles.
Graeme is on the right track I think. A lot of these profiles are built
the same way, and many of the tables could have the same "grid". What
we've been thinking is to almost interleave multiple profiles' LUTs so
that we can compress adjacent bytes better, then put them back together
at the other end. Does this sound like it'd work? Has anyone seen this
done before?
Tom
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden