• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Hutch Targets
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Hutch Targets


  • Subject: Re: Hutch Targets
  • From: Kevin Muldoon <email@hidden>
  • Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2006 13:08:14 -0500

Understood.

Now, while I have you on the line I have a question regarding 'Objective Objectives'.

In Chapter 9 of the 2003 issue of Real World Color Management, you spend considerable amount of pages showing an input profile evaluation technique using a Greytag-MacBeth freeware application called 'ColorLab'. I recently downloaded the freeware app and have found it radically updated for OSX (the 2003 RWCM shows screen shots of an OS9 version). In short, I can't really make heads or tails of it.

Question...

Is it worth my while to buy the latest edition of RWCM in (assuming the same technique is explained for the OSX version of ColorLab) or would a visual examination of the GrangerRainbow be the most practical way to go. The 'ColorLab' eval proceedure appears exhausting!

Thanks!



On Mar 11, 2006, at 12:47 PM, bruce fraser wrote:

At 10:34 PM -0800 3/10/06, Marco Ugolini wrote:


Hi Bruce.

You mean to say that one ought to keep setting different gamma values in the
scanner software when scanning the target, then create a profile for each of
those gamma values and assign it to the raw scan of the target, until one
achieves the lowest Delta E values compared to the reference file: is that
correct?

Yes, exactly.

It's been a while since I last used an Imacon, and I forget whether it
allows the user to specify precise increments in gamma values (e.g., 2.1,
2.2, 2.3, etc.): I seem to remember that it does, or am I mistaken?

The Imacon lets you specify a gamma value, as do many other CCD scanners. Most drum scanners let you specify a tone curve. In either case, the principle is the same.


The best-fit tone curve typically produces scans that are a little flat, but with very accurate hue and saturation relationships. It's easy to tweak the tonality to get great results.

Bruce
--
email@hidden

_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: This email sent to email@hidden
  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Hutch Targets
      • From: bruce fraser <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: Hutch Targets (From: Marco Ugolini <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Hutch Targets (From: bruce fraser <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Hutch Targets
  • Next by Date: Re: Hutch Targets
  • Previous by thread: Re: Hutch Targets
  • Next by thread: Re: Hutch Targets
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread