Re: ICC workflow & SRDS specs
Re: ICC workflow & SRDS specs
- Subject: Re: ICC workflow & SRDS specs
- From: Roger Breton <email@hidden>
- Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2006 16:26:57 -0500
> Roger,
>
> I am not sure what you are going after.
Simply that, as you already know, adjusting for TIL *alone* has limited
applicability when it comes to capturing the behavior of various presses
employed by the various publishers listed in the SRDS.
> My response was based on til. If the specification is for 260% til then you
> would need to create a profile and color separations for that condition.
Right. And there is nothing to say what ink colors is used, dot gain, etc.
> I don't work with SRDS so I don't know all of those detail. But if I was in
> touch with the folks who do the publications I might ask for a test to
> verify the til conditions. I am sure that would be more than a ten minute
> phone call.
Yes, of course.
> The hope would be to change from multiple separation specs to one color
> separation method that becomes a standard. That standard could be an Adode
> profile or even a custom press profile that is an average of different press
> conditions.
Beautiful. I'm all for it.
> That is why Gracol 7 is so attractive. It provides a standardized target to
> calibrate multiple presses and proofers to.
Yup.
> Jim Rich
Sorry for the confusion,
Roger Breton | Laval, Canada | email@hidden
http://pages.infinit.net/graxx
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden