Re: MonacoPROFILER and UV
Re: MonacoPROFILER and UV
- Subject: Re: MonacoPROFILER and UV
- From: Marco Ugolini <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2006 15:56:33 -0700
I am not a scientist, so what I am going to say here is pure conjecture
based on inductive reasoning (or is it deductive...?).
But here it goes: a UV filter is a physical object of a given shape, color
and texture, made to fit a given condition created by FWAs (Fluorescent
Whitening Agents). So, if the conditions change (a type of FWAs with
different visual characteristics), it would seem to follow that the type of
filter would have to change too.
(How am I doing so far...?)
So the question is: do FWAs come in just one "flavor"? Meaning: do they
always produce one and the same given set of effects on the visible
spectrum, or is there a range to how they look and the effects they have on
the paper to which they are applied?
If the answer is that they come in different "flavors," then how can it be
maintained that *any one* given UV filter does the most appropriate job
possible in filtering *any* given set of FWAs?
If FWAs do come in different "flavors," then it would seem logical that
software corrections have the obvious advantage of being far more flexible
and adaptable to the specifics of the case at hand.
Thank you.
--------------
Marco Ugolini
Mill Valley, CA
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden