Re: MonacoPROFILER and UV
Re: MonacoPROFILER and UV
- Subject: Re: MonacoPROFILER and UV
- From: Marco Ugolini <email@hidden>
- Date: Sat, 09 Sep 2006 14:07:45 -0700
In a message dated 9/9/06 9:30 AM, Roger Breton wrote:
> Marco,
>
>> I'm afraid that as long as brightness and whiteness remain marketing assets
>> that make a product more appealing to the public, FWAs will remain.
>>
>> Marco Ugolini
>
> Depends which public we're talking. Oris, GMG, Tecco and I'm sure a few
> others all sell optical brighteners free papers, albeit at a premium. So, in
> my view, it all depends how critical is color matching for a given
> application. I know I'd be willing to pay an extra for OB-free proofing
> papers for press proofing. But I would not necessarily need it to run
> pictures of the local 8 year old kids baseball group ;-)
Hi Roger.
There is also the issue of how much fluorescence is in papers used on
commercial printing presses. I say that because, even if we were to pay a
premium for OB-free inkjet proofing papers, isn't the proofing process
rendered somewhat imprecise if the press run is done with a type of paper
that has FWAs?
This fluorescence things is truly a pain...
--------------
Marco Ugolini
Mill Valley, CA
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden