Re: To UV or not
Re: To UV or not
- Subject: Re: To UV or not
- From: Roger Breton <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 22:50:10 -0400
> It seems your proofing paper has some fluorescent whitening agents. Does the
> proofing paper read differently with and without UV?
So true :(
> I have always found a better visual match when UV is included/not filtered.
I'll respect that opinion.
> The FWAs affect your perception of the color as long as there is UV in the
> viewing light, therefore, you must have the excited readings. The problem is
> usually how to compensate for the low UV from the incandescent lights in
> common spectrophotometer.
Isn't that a problem. My present approach to that problem is favoring
proofing substrates devoid of FWAs. So I don't have to use a UV filter on my
instrument and I'm more confident in my numbers agreeing with my visual
sensation.
But that is only good to solve one part of the problem: I just don't see how
I can work around the press papers being full of OBs!
> Bret Hesler
Roger Breton | Laval, Canada | email@hidden
http://pages.infinit.net/graxx
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden