Re: To UV or not
Re: To UV or not
- Subject: Re: To UV or not
- From: Bret Hesler <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 07:54:35 -0400
- Thread-topic: To UV or not
> Isn't that a problem. My present approach to that problem is favoring
> proofing substrates devoid of FWAs. So I don't have to use a UV filter on my
> instrument and I'm more confident in my numbers agreeing with my visual
> sensation.
>
I am not a fan of the FWA-free papers, simply because the printing papers
still have them. Imagine two viewing booths with different UV content. You
may get a good match in one booth, but the paper with FWAs will shift color
when you view it in the other booth. That is metamerism.
Removing FWAs from one side of the equation does not really solve the
problem, and it does not look like the paper industry will be removing them
any time soon. There is a group working with Idealliance and/or ISO to
hammer out these issues, but I am not sure what they will decide.
--
Bret Hesler
L.P. Thebault Company
Parsippany, New Jersey
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden