Re: To UV or not
Re: To UV or not
- Subject: Re: To UV or not
- From: Bret Hesler <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 07:06:54 -0400
- Thread-topic: To UV or not
True, but I am in the commercial printing market, mostly printing on #1's
#2's and #3's. The lowest grade paper we have printed on was a groundwood #4
and it did have FWAs.
--
Bret Hesler
L.P. Thebault Company
Parsippany, New Jersey
On 9/22/06 12:02 AM, "Roger Breton" <email@hidden> wrote:
>> I am not a fan of the FWA-free papers, simply because the printing papers
>> still have them.
>> --
>> Bret Hesler
>
> Show me FWA in Monterrey Gloss #5, SWOP's current #5 coated reference paper.
> Not a trace I can see.
>
> Roger Breton | Laval, Canada | email@hidden
> http://pages.infinit.net/graxx
>
>
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden