Lists

Terms and Conditions
Lists hosted on this site
Email the Postmaster
Tips for posting to public mailing lists

Re: Metamerism vs Color Constancy - No! Again? [Was: To UV or not]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Metamerism vs Color Constancy - No! Again? [Was: To UV or not]

Subject: Re: Metamerism vs Color Constancy - No! Again? [Was: To UV or not]
From: "Bob Frost" <email@hidden>
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 12:27:45 +0100

Graeme,

Why not correct them then? That is what Wikepedia is all about!

Bob Frost.

----- Original Message ----- From: "Graeme Gill" <email@hidden>


The Wikipedia entry seems to be full of the same sort of errors:
ie. "Observer metamerism", where it really means
"Observer metameric differences", etc.


_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


Follow-Ups:

Re: Eizo DG211
From: "Bob Frost" <email@hidden>
Re: Metamerism vs Color Constancy - No! Again? [Was: To UV or not]
From: Graeme Gill <email@hidden>


References:  
  >Metamerism vs Color Constancy - No! Again? [Was: To UV or not] (From: Marco Ugolini <email@hidden>)
  >Re: Metamerism vs Color Constancy - No! Again? [Was: To UV or not] (From: Graeme Gill <email@hidden>)




Prev by Date:
Re: To UV or not

Next by Date:
Re: Remote Proof printing

Previous by thread:
Re: Metamerism vs Color Constancy - No! Again? [Was: To UV or not]

Next by thread:
Re: Metamerism vs Color Constancy - No! Again? [Was: To UV or not]

Index(es):

Date
Thread