Re: how to optimize black in CMYK profile of a digital laser output system?
Re: how to optimize black in CMYK profile of a digital laser output system?
- Subject: Re: how to optimize black in CMYK profile of a digital laser output system?
- From: email@hidden
- Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 09:41:39 +0800
Thanks Louis, I've tried and seen no obvious enhancement, now the point is
when we use default server CMYK profile, the black is better, is there any
way to optimize custom profile by software?
Cheers,
Rebecca Peng
PGA
Canon (China) Co., Ltd. Shanghai Branch
F18, Central Plaza, No.381 Middle Huaihai Rd. Shanghai, 200020
Tel:(021) 6391 6500 * 332 Fax:(021) 6391 6211
www.canon.com.cn
Louis Dery
<email@hidden> To: "email@hidden List" <email@hidden>
cc: email@hidden
2007-08-02 09:24 Subject: Re: how to optimize black in CMYK profile of a digital laser output system?
Try to use "Source GCR" option in Color manager in the Fiery RIP
regards,
Louis Dery
TGLC inc.
www.perfxshots.com
www.perfxprints.com
On Aug 1, 2007, at 8:40 PM, email@hidden wrote:
>
> Hello, everyone,
>
> I have a customer who bought a Canon imagePRESS C7000VP with EFI Fiery
> server, he has generated a CMYK profile on this printer by ES-1000
> (OEM
> eye-one) with ProfileMaker 5.05, however, we found its black
> gradation is
> not so smooth, are there some methods to help to optimize the black
> curve?
>
> Cheers,
> Rebecca Peng
>
>
>
>
> |---------
> +--------------------------------------------------------------->
> | | colorsync-users-
> email@hidden |
> | | Sent
> by: |
> | | colorsync-users-bounces
> +lirui_peng=canon.com.cn@list|
> | |
> s.apple.com |
> |
> | |
> |
> | |
> | | 2007-08-01
> 21:26 |
> | | Please respond to colorsync-
> users |
> |
> | |
> |---------
> +--------------------------------------------------------------->
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> --------------------------|
>
> |
> |
> | To: colorsync-
> email@hidden |
> |
> cc:
> |
> | Subject: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 4, Issue
> 294 |
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> --------------------------|
>
>
>
>
> Send Colorsync-users mailing list submissions to
> email@hidden
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/colorsync-users
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> email@hidden
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> email@hidden
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Colorsync-users digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: Mac Book Pro display (Nov06)
> 2. Re: UV Filter - DTP70/Spectrocam (David Scharf)
> 3. Re: Mac Book Pro display (Derek Lambert)
> 4. New line of Epson inkjets (Marco Ugolini)
> 5. Re: DTP70 - 2 step or not 2 step? (Scott Martin)
> 6. Re: New line of Epson inkjets (sfprintservices)
> 7. Re: New line of Epson inkjets (Scott Martin)
> 8. Re: New line of Epson inkjets (Dana Rasmussen)
> 9. Re: New line of Epson inkjets (Scott Martin)
> 10. Re: New line of Epson inkjets (Gary Scott)
> 11. Re: UV Filter - DTP70 (Graeme Gill)
> 12. Re: New line of Epson inkjets (email@hidden)
> 13. Re: New line of Epson inkjets (Graeme Gill)
> 14. Microsoft photo format almost a standard?
> (email@hidden)
> 15. Re: New line of Epson inkjets (Andrew Rodney)
> 16. Re: New line of Epson inkjets (Scott Martin)
> 17. Re: Creating an ICC profile from a Pulse Spectrophotometer
> (G Mike Adams)
> 18. Re: Akua Sweets (Fleisher, Ken)
> 19. Re: Akua Sweets (Fleisher, Ken)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 02:18:02 +0200
> From: Nov06 <email@hidden>
> Subject: Re: Mac Book Pro display
> To: ColorSync Users Mailing List <email@hidden>
> Message-ID: <email@hidden>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
>
> This is only very indirectly answering the question of matte vs.
> glossy, but here is a comprehensive review of the MacBook Pro from a
> photographers perspective:
> http://www.robgalbraith.com/bins/content_page.asp?cid=7-8741-9027
>
> On 01.08.2007, at 01:42, Matt Beals wrote:
>
>> No, no, no... It wouldn't be for color critical work. Just "if I
>> have to
>> pick one, which one is less bad?". I'd like to have "reasonably
>> accurate"
>> but I don't do color correction professionally. I do adjust
>> pictures I take
>> with my Sony DSC-W7 but again it's nothing critical. The most I
>> would be
>> doing is cast removal. I don't even do much in the way of soft
>> proofing or
>> PDF proofing on screen.
>>
>> I guess that the consensus is the matte display.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 18:07:18 -0700
> From: David Scharf <email@hidden>
> Subject: Re: UV Filter - DTP70/Spectrocam
> To: Roger Breton <email@hidden>
> Cc: ColorSync <email@hidden>
> Message-ID: <email@hidden>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Yeah Roger,
>
> I have a SpectroCam too. Found it it to be real good instrument.
> Still
> using it with ProfilerPro. Do any of the newer, perhaps better,
> profiling programs still support the SpectroCam?
>
> Regards,
>
> David
>
> *DAVID SCHARF PHOTOGRAPHY*
> Scanning Electron Microscopy
>
> Los Angeles, CA 90039
> http://www.scharfphoto.com
> http://www.electronmicro.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Roger Breton wrote:
>>> Doesn't anyone use pulsed xenon light sources any more? Seems like a
>>> wide bandwidth source like that would be best. No?
>>>
>>> David Scharf
>>>
>>
>> I still have my faithful SpectroCam which has a Xenon light
>> source. But I
>> confess I don't give it the mileage it deserves :(
>>
>> Roger Breton
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 21:36:59 -0400
> From: Derek Lambert <email@hidden>
> Subject: Re: Mac Book Pro display
> To: ColorSync <email@hidden>
> Message-ID: <email@hidden>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
>
> Matt,
>
> I used to have matte 15" powerbook before. I sold it.
>
> I was comparing both new MBP in Apple store and I liked glossy. I
> bought MacBookPro glossy for myself. My wife has matte MacBook. I
> think it glossy is a little sharper and it has more contrast. I don't
> use it for critical color.
>
> Derek Lambert
>
> On Jul 31, 2007, at 6:02 PM, Matt Beals wrote:
>
>> When looking at color on a MacBook Pro which is "better", "lesser
>> of two
>> evils",etc, the matte display or the glossy display?
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 19:40:32 -0700
> From: Marco Ugolini <email@hidden>
> Subject: New line of Epson inkjets
> To: ColorSync Users Mailing List <email@hidden>
> Message-ID: <C2D540B0.10A54%email@hidden>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
>
> To the List:
>
> Epson has announced a new line of UltraChrome printers, to be
> introduced on
> the market this coming October:
>
> MacWorld article:
> <http://tinyurl.com/2fmn9v>
>
> Press release:
> <http://tinyurl.com/2szzbp>
>
> (NOTE: I believe that the prices written in the press release are
> given in
> Australian dollars, so they should be multiplied by 0.834 to give an
> approximate equivalent in U.S. dollars)
>
> Among the innovations, those that stand out for me are that they use a
> reformulated set of K3 inks (Magenta is replaced with "Vivid
> Magenta", and
> "Light Magenta" with "Vivid Light Magenta"), which supposedly
> expands the
> output gamut. Plus, they are claimed to have a new nozzle coating
> system
> that prevents clogging.
>
> We'll see.
>
> Marco Ugolini
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 23:27:31 -0500
> From: Scott Martin <email@hidden>
> Subject: Re: DTP70 - 2 step or not 2 step?
> To: ColorSync Users Mailing List <email@hidden>
> Message-ID: <email@hidden>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII;
> delsp=yes; format=flowed
>
>
> On Jul 31, 2007, at 1:32 PM, Steve Upton wrote:
>
>>>> BTW, I hate to call it linearization since it doesn't directly
>>>> linearize the printer prior to profiling. I like "device customized
>>>> profile target generation" but I'm open to other, shorter ideas...
>>>
>>> Isn't the process properly called "pre-linearization"?
>>
>> actually I prefer to call it adaptive targeting.
>
> I like that! But what you are talking about is slightly different.
> Just like generic targets, Bill's 9600 adapted targets end up getting
> used for all kind of devices, not just 9600s. Adapting the target for
> each device at the time of profiling with a 2 step process is key.
> Nonetheless, I like your "adaptive targeting" termonology.
>
> Scott Martin
> www.on-sight.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 21:33:14 -0700
> From: sfprintservices <email@hidden>
> Subject: Re: New line of Epson inkjets
> To: Marco Ugolini <email@hidden>, ColorSync Users
> Mailing
> List <email@hidden>
> Message-ID: <C2D55B1A.22C48%email@hidden>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
>
> HPZ3xxx line has already covered the wider gamut issue
> HPZ3xxx line has already covered the nozzle clogging issue
>
> Epson may be a dollar short and a day late.
>
> Can you say InDesign vs. Quark?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Gary Scott
> Landor Associates
> --
>
>
>> From: Marco Ugolini <email@hidden>
>> Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 19:40:32 -0700
>> To: ColorSync Users Mailing List <email@hidden>
>> Conversation: New line of Epson inkjets
>> Subject: New line of Epson inkjets
>>
>> To the List:
>>
>> Epson has announced a new line of UltraChrome printers, to be
>> introduced
> on
>> the market this coming October:
>>
>> MacWorld article:
>> <http://tinyurl.com/2fmn9v>
>>
>> Press release:
>> <http://tinyurl.com/2szzbp>
>>
>> (NOTE: I believe that the prices written in the press release are
>> given
> in
>> Australian dollars, so they should be multiplied by 0.834 to give an
>> approximate equivalent in U.S. dollars)
>>
>> Among the innovations, those that stand out for me are that they
>> use a
>> reformulated set of K3 inks (Magenta is replaced with "Vivid
>> Magenta",
> and
>> "Light Magenta" with "Vivid Light Magenta"), which supposedly
>> expands the
>> output gamut. Plus, they are claimed to have a new nozzle coating
>> system
>> that prevents clogging.
>>
>> We'll see.
>>
>> Marco Ugolini
>>
>>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 23:43:16 -0500
> From: Scott Martin <email@hidden>
> Subject: Re: New line of Epson inkjets
> To: sfprintservices <email@hidden>,
> ColorSync Users
> Mailing List <email@hidden>
> Message-ID: <email@hidden>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII;
> delsp=yes; format=flowed
>
>
>> HPZ3xxx line has already covered the wider gamut issue
>> HPZ3xxx line has already covered the nozzle clogging issue
>
> Let's not forget Canon has a wider gamut (with PS plug-in) and faster
> speeds than HP and Epson.
>
>> Epson may be a dollar short and a day late.
>
> Yep but they have brand loyalty, low entry prices and fairly low per
> milliliter ink costs. Epson lower manufacturing costs with 8 instead
> of 12 heads is smart. Black ink switching is really frustrating
> though.
>
> Scott Martin
> www.on-sight.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 8
> Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 21:57:02 -0700
> From: Dana Rasmussen <email@hidden>
> Subject: Re: New line of Epson inkjets
> To: Colorsync <email@hidden>
> Message-ID: <C2D560AE.4120A%email@hidden>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
>
>> Yep but they have brand loyalty, low entry prices and fairly low per
>> milliliter ink costs. Epson lower manufacturing costs with 8 instead
>> of 12 heads is smart. Black ink switching is really frustrating
>> though.
>>
>> Scott Martin
>> www.on-sight.com
> There are signs of things to come, too.
> The 64" printer has a 9 port head.
> Dana Rasmussen
> Glazer¹s Camera
> 430 8th Ave. N
> Seattle, WA 98109
> 206-624-1100 x1027
> Fax 206-624-8065
> email@hidden
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 9
> Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 00:06:22 -0500
> From: Scott Martin <email@hidden>
> Subject: Re: New line of Epson inkjets
> To: Dana Rasmussen <email@hidden>, Colorsync
> <email@hidden>
> Message-ID: <email@hidden>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII;
> delsp=yes; format=flowed
>
>
>> There are signs of things to come, too.
>> The 64" printer has a 9 port head.
>
> Right! And twice and many nozzles per head for faster printing.
> Better paper handling would be nice and about time. I think one of
> the unanswered questions is if Epson will release the vivid magenta
> inks for the previous K3 ink printers (they talked about this as an
> option a while back). I'm guessing they won't.
>
> Scott Martin
> www.on-sight.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 10
> Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 22:15:02 -0700
> From: Gary Scott <email@hidden>
> Subject: Re: New line of Epson inkjets
> To: Colorsync <email@hidden>
> Message-ID: <C2D564E6.6964%email@hidden>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
>
> Not according to this article:
>
> http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/printers/epson-
> facelift.shtml
>
> ³And, to the inevitable question from current "00" series printer
> owners,
> the answer is no the new inks will not work in the old printers. The
> previous design heads won't handle them, and therefore they are keyed
> differently.²
>
>
> On 7/31/07 10:06 PM, "Scott Martin" <email@hidden> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>> There are signs of things to come, too.
>>> The 64" printer has a 9 port head.
>>
>> Right! And twice and many nozzles per head for faster printing.
>> Better paper handling would be nice and about time. I think one of
>> the unanswered questions is if Epson will release the vivid magenta
>> inks for the previous K3 ink printers (they talked about this as an
>> option a while back). I'm guessing they won't.
>>
>> Scott Martin
>> www.on-sight.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>> Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>>
> sf_printservices@sfo
> .
>> landor.com
>>
>> This email sent to email@hidden
>>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Gary Scott
> S.F. Print Services
> Landor Associates
>
> 415.365.4418 voice
> 415.748.0217 cell
> 415.365.3190 fax
> email@hidden
> --
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 11
> Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2007 18:13:21 +1000
> From: Graeme Gill <email@hidden>
> Subject: Re: UV Filter - DTP70
> To: ColorSync <email@hidden>
> Message-ID: <email@hidden>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Marco Ugolini wrote:
>
>> In my own opinion, Graeme, there is a user side and a technology /
>> manufacturer's side to the tools we use in our work. My natural
> inclination
>> is to side with the user, because I'm one too.
>
> And I think that's exactly what I'm doing here, siding with the user.
> The user shouldn't have to understand the mechanism used (filters
> and all that stuff), they should be able to directly request
> what they want, a reading that includes UV illumination, or
> one that does not.
>
> I think the issue driving this discussion is that traditionally
> the user was intimately involved in the means of doing this
> (ie. fitting or removing a UV filter from an instrument),
> so this is the dominant mindset of those with a long involvement
> in this stuff. Someone approaching instruments that
> conceal the mechanism (a switch or UV LED) for the first time will
> probably find this talk of filters, indirect and confusing.
>
>> There are many levels of use for these measuring instruments. Some
>> people
>> may view the use of anything other than the strictly and
>> terminologically
>> correct nomenclature on the instrument as a step down a slippery
>> slope.
> But
>> if all that the user *needs* to know is that the measurement has
>> to be
> made
>> with the UV filter on, is it really necessary to force the user
>> instead
> to
>> perform mental acrobatics for the sake of preserving "good U/I
>> design"?
> If
>> it's not good for the user, whom is good for?
>
> But you are expecting the user to be an "expert" in the operational
> mechanism of the instrument (fitting filters), exactly what you
> have just been arguing against ! :-) :-)
>
> Graeme Gill.
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 12
> Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2007 04:31:41 -0400
> From: "email@hidden" <email@hidden>
> Subject: Re: New line of Epson inkjets
> To: sfprintservices <email@hidden>
> Cc: ColorSync Users Mailing List <email@hidden>
> Message-ID: <email@hidden>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
>
> 1) I think that Epson's pricing structure is unrealistic if the
> Austrailian dollar conversion is $10895 to US $9335 for the 9880.
> 2) That price does not include any color calibration hardware or
> software, which makes the price of admission hugely over inflated,
> relative to the z3100 44".
> 3) The Epson waste bottle issue is likely still present -
> contributing to ongoing high consumables costs.
> 4) No mention of whether it can print full page bleed images (as the
> z3100 does)
>
> Even if they release the x880 on time, Epson simply is not bringing
> the right mix to the table.
>
> - Jon
>
> On Aug 1, 2007, at 12:33 AM, sfprintservices wrote:
>
>> Epson may be a dollar short and a day late.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 13
> Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2007 19:25:18 +1000
> From: Graeme Gill <email@hidden>
> Subject: Re: New line of Epson inkjets
> To: ColorSync <email@hidden>
> Message-ID: <email@hidden>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> email@hidden wrote:
>> 1) I think that Epson's pricing structure is unrealistic if the
>> Austrailian dollar conversion is $10895 to US $9335 for the 9880.
>
> I think like many companies, Epson (and/or its dealers) whack a fair
> margin on "non core" country sales prices (Adobe in Europe anyone ?).
>
> It wouldn't surprise me to learn that the US price was more
> like US$7K.
>
> Graeme Gill.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 14
> Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 07:17:41 -0500
> From: "email@hidden" <email@hidden>
> Subject: Microsoft photo format almost a standard?
> To: ColorSync Users' List <email@hidden>
> Message-ID: <email@hidden>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
>
> Anybody got any comments about "JPEG XR"? Is the article overselling
> the position?
>
> http://www.usatoday.com/tech/products/cnet/2007-07-31-microsoft-hd-
> photo_N.htm?csp=34
>
> Rich Apollo
> G7 Certified Expert
> Adobe Certified Expert, Photoshop
> 314-344-1144
> email@hidden
> www.prioritylitho.com
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 15
> Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2007 06:32:46 -0600
> From: Andrew Rodney <email@hidden>
> Subject: Re: New line of Epson inkjets
> To: Scott Martin <email@hidden>, sfprintservices
> <email@hidden>,
> "email@hidden"
> <email@hidden>
> Message-ID: <C2D5D98E.42726%email@hidden>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
>
> On 7/31/07 10:43 PM, "Scott Martin" wrote:
>
>> Let's not forget Canon has a wider gamut (with PS plug-in) and faster
>> speeds than HP and Epson.
>
> You mean the plug-in that's still not Intel Native and I can't use in
> Lightroom?
>
> Andrew Rodney
> http://www.digitaldog.net/
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 16
> Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 08:02:35 -0500
> From: Scott Martin <email@hidden>
> Subject: Re: New line of Epson inkjets
> To: "email@hidden"
> <email@hidden>
> Message-ID: <email@hidden>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII;
> delsp=yes; format=flowed
>
>
> On Aug 1, 2007, at 7:32 AM, Andrew Rodney wrote:
>>> Let's not forget Canon has a wider gamut (with PS plug-in) and
>>> faster
>>> speeds than HP and Epson.
>> You mean the plug-in that's still not Intel Native and I can't use in
>> Lightroom?
>
> Yep! I'm told the Intel native should be out any day now but you are
> right: the fact that they have the best gamut with the plug-in
> contrasts with the fact you can only get that quality from one
> application. So this printer may appeal to fine art printmakers
> printing out of photoshop but not to designers wanting spot color
> simulation from InDesign, Illustrator, etc. Each solution from HP,
> Canon and Epson has their own advantages and disadvantages. I think
> Canon's gamut, speed and cost superiority is getting overlooked right
> now, so that's why I mentioned it.
>
> Scott Martin
> www.on-sight.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 17
> Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 08:14:44 -0500
> From: G Mike Adams <email@hidden>
> Subject: Re: Creating an ICC profile from a Pulse Spectrophotometer
> To: Michael Tiktinsky <email@hidden>
> Cc: email@hidden
> Message-ID: <email@hidden>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252; delsp=yes;
> format=flowed
>
>
>> Hello:
>> I have a Mac (Intel based).
>> I have a Pulse spectrophotometer (DTP20UV).
>> I have an Epson 4000 printer.
>> I have downloaded 1728 targets from Bill Atkinson's website.
>> X-rite has a special program, ColorPort that will read the data
>> from the 1728 targets using the Pulse and save it to a file in one
>> of a number of formats.
>> Unfortunately, Xrite wants between $2500 and $4000 for software
>> that will convert that output file to an ICC profile. Do any of
>> you have any suggestions that do not require spending a small
>> fortune to be able to use targets other than x-rites and create icc
>> profiles from them? Thanks for any help you can provide.
>
>
> You can use Argyll.
>
> http://argyllcms.com/
>
> It's command-line, and so you have to learn a little Unix to make it
> work. But work it does.
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
> Mike Adams
> http://correctcolor.org
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 18
> Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2007 09:24:20 -0400
> From: "Fleisher, Ken" <email@hidden>
> Subject: Re: Akua Sweets
> To: colorsync user <email@hidden>
> Message-ID: <C2D601C4.2F52%email@hidden>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
>
> Thanks for the reply. I don't have an Intel Mac, so as long as it
> will run
> correctly for now, I'm happy. Thanks for the confirmation.
>
>
> On 8/1/07 9:20 AM, "Helmut Fuchs" <email@hidden> wrote:
>
>> Hello Ken,
>>
>> well, AFAIK version 1.43 is the latest version. But it is from 2001,
>> so it is more than a little dated. More important is, that 2001 no
>> one had an idea of Universal Binaries, so this OSAX won't work on
>> Intel Macs.
>>
>> So I guess, it would be better to look for another tool to do the job
>> you intended it for.
>
>
> --
> Ken Fleisher
>
> Photographer
> Imaging & Visual Services
> National Gallery of Art
> Washington, D.C.
>
> Phone: (202) 712-7471
> email@hidden
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 19
> Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2007 09:25:59 -0400
> From: "Fleisher, Ken" <email@hidden>
> Subject: Re: Akua Sweets
> To: colorsync user <email@hidden>
> Message-ID: <C2D60227.2F56%email@hidden>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
>
> Sorry, wrong list by mistake!
>
>
> On 8/1/07 9:24 AM, "Fleisher, Ken" <email@hidden> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the reply. I don't have an Intel Mac, so as long as it
>> will
> run
>> correctly for now, I'm happy. Thanks for the confirmation.
>>
>>
>> On 8/1/07 9:20 AM, "Helmut Fuchs" <email@hidden> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello Ken,
>>>
>>> well, AFAIK version 1.43 is the latest version. But it is from 2001,
>>> so it is more than a little dated. More important is, that 2001 no
>>> one had an idea of Universal Binaries, so this OSAX won't work on
>>> Intel Macs.
>>>
>>> So I guess, it would be better to look for another tool to do the
>>> job
>>> you intended it for.
>
>
> --
> Ken Fleisher
>
> Photographer
> Imaging & Visual Services
> National Gallery of Art
> Washington, D.C.
>
> Phone: (202) 712-7471
> email@hidden
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Colorsync-users mailing list
> email@hidden
> http://lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/colorsync-users
>
> End of Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 4, Issue 294
> ***********************************************
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
> 40tglc.com
>
> This email sent to email@hidden
>
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden