Re: Monitor profile verification [was: Eye One Pro for monitor calibration? [was: Re: NEC 2690 SpectraView]]
Re: Monitor profile verification [was: Eye One Pro for monitor calibration? [was: Re: NEC 2690 SpectraView]]
- Subject: Re: Monitor profile verification [was: Eye One Pro for monitor calibration? [was: Re: NEC 2690 SpectraView]]
- From: Graeme Gill <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2007 12:40:38 +1100
Jim Rich wrote:
And if I am understanding your points about L*a*b* and monitor profiles, it
is very common with monitor profiles to use XYZ instead of L*a* b*.
Almost always, because displays have often close to perfect additive
behaviour. This means that a shaper + matrix in XYZ space often
models display behaviour quite accurately, and CLUTs in XYZ space
will also be similarly accurate. [There are disadvantages in shaper/matrix
when it comes down to supporting intents, and it can be difficult
sometimes to arrange a B2A table to be much good when its in XYZ
space too.]
None of this has any baring on verifying profile accuracy.
Graeme Gill.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden