Lists

Terms and Conditions
Lists hosted on this site
Email the Postmaster
Tips for posting to public mailing lists

Re: Monitor profile verification [was: Eye One Pro for monitor calibration? [was: Re: NEC 2690 SpectraView]]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Monitor profile verification [was: Eye One Pro for monitor calibration? [was: Re: NEC 2690 SpectraView]]

Subject: Re: Monitor profile verification [was: Eye One Pro for monitor calibration? [was: Re: NEC 2690 SpectraView]]
From: Graeme Gill <email@hidden>
Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2007 19:39:46 +1100

Marco Ugolini wrote:

It would seem that starting from an L*a*b* list in an 8-bit environment
could introduce a larger rounding error in the RGB values sent to the
display.


Sounds unlikely. We're talking calibration or profile
verification, not transforming images, so why would anyone quantize
to 8 bits when floating point numbers can easily be used ?

Graeme Gill.

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


Follow-Ups:

Re: Monitor profile verification [was: Eye One Pro for monitor calibration? [was: Re: NEC 2690 SpectraView]]
From: Marco Ugolini <email@hidden>


References:  
  >Re: Monitor profile verification [was: Eye One Pro for monitor calibration? [was: Re: NEC 2690 SpectraView]] (From: Marco Ugolini <email@hidden>)




Prev by Date:
Re: Monitor profile verification [was: Eye One Pro for

Next by Date:
Re: Monitor profile verification [was: Eye One Pro for monitor calibration? [was: Re: NEC 2690 SpectraView]]

Previous by thread:
Re: Monitor profile verification [was: Eye One Pro for monitor calibration? [was: Re: NEC 2690 SpectraView]]

Next by thread:
Re: Monitor profile verification [was: Eye One Pro for monitor calibration? [was: Re: NEC 2690 SpectraView]]

Index(es):

Date
Thread