U-DACT tests for informal comparison of Eye-One Pro and DTP94
U-DACT tests for informal comparison of Eye-One Pro and DTP94
- Subject: U-DACT tests for informal comparison of Eye-One Pro and DTP94
- From: Martin Orpen <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2007 10:01:58 +0000
U-DACT test results (PASS) from Quato 23" display calibrated with Eye-
One Pro and measured with same instrument:
<http://www.web36531.clarahost.co.uk/filedump/Report_23_UGRA_i1.pdf>
U-DACT test results (PASS) from Quato 23" display calibrated with
DTP94 and measured with same instrument:
<http://www.web36531.clarahost.co.uk/filedump/Report_23_UGRA_DTP94.pdf>
U-DACT test results (PASS) from Quato 23" display calibrated with Eye-
One Pro but measured with DTP94:
<http://www.web36531.clarahost.co.uk/filedump/Report_23_DTP94_i1.pdf>
U-DACT test results (FAIL) from Quato 23" display calibrated with
DTP94 but measured with Eye-One Pro:
<http://www.web36531.clarahost.co.uk/filedump/Report_23_i1_DTP94.pdf>
Tests were informally done. Things that I find interesting are firstly
that the Eye-One Pro measures better gray balance results from the
DTP94 produced profile. Secondly, there is something really odd going
on with the white point measurements. The Eye-One Pro produces a 5800K
match that looks more like 6000+ to me on screen. So I can understand
it failing the DTP94 calibration on white point but can't understand
how the DTP94 passes the Eye-One Pro white point?
--
Martin Orpen
Idea Digital Imaging Ltd
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden