Lists

Open Menu Close Menu

Terms and Conditions
Lists hosted on this site
Email the Postmaster
Tips for posting to public mailing lists

Re: Results of an informal comparison between various display instruments.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Results of an informal comparison between various display instruments.

Subject: Re: Results of an informal comparison between various display instruments.
From: Graeme Gill <email@hidden>
Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2007 23:51:12 +1100

Lorenzo Ridolfi wrote:

Great! Quite interesting your results, in particular the differences between i1pro3 and i1pro10. Are you doing some sort of filtering, spectral correction or moving averaging in the i1pro3 driver?


I use a different resampling filter from the raw CCD values,
that's all. Given the repeatability, the difference between
the 10nm and 3.3nm modes is not significant on these tests.

Graeme Gill.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden



References:  
  >Results of an informal comparison between various display	instruments. (From: Graeme Gill <email@hidden>)
  >Re: Results of an informal comparison between various	display	instruments. (From: Lorenzo Ridolfi <email@hidden>)




Prev by Date:
Re: Results of an informal comparison between various display instruments.

Next by Date:
Re: U-DACT tests for informal comparison of Eye-One Pro and DTP94

Previous by thread:
Re: Results of an informal comparison between various display instruments.

Next by thread:
U-DACT tests for informal comparison of Eye-One Pro and DTP94

Index(es):

Date
Thread