Re: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 4, Issue 449
Re: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 4, Issue 449
- Subject: Re: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 4, Issue 449
- From: Andrew Rodney <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 07:52:27 -0700
- Thread-topic: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 4, Issue 449
On 12/10/07 11:42 PM, "tom lianza" wrote:
> Generally a colorimeter will measure into the darker regions
> better than a spectro.
Thanks again Tom and Will for all the great information.
I think I alluded to this point about dark measurements but was told "its
not necessarily true" or something to that effect, or a Spectrophotometer
could/can do this task (which is likely very true). That the current set of
tools we have provide one function better than the other, at the expense
elsewhere should have been made clearer in my initial post.
So, with the current crop of products, its back to the right tool for the
right job.
It appears, and correct me if I'm wrong, with the current crop of tools and
newer display technology, we (being the end user) may be best served either
having both instruments, recognizing the caliber and focus of this list, or
we need a colorimeter that is mated to the display. Isn't this how Barco,
Pressview and Artisan operated?
The best calibration products I've used over the years, with respect to
displays has always been those that were fully integrated. A display,
software and instrument, all communicating together. While often a higher
initial price point, it always served my needs well. I'm still using an
aging Sony Artisan (thankfully it runs fine under Leopard I'm happy to
report), and a more modern solution, the NEC 2690 with SpectrView software
and a combo of an EyeOne Pro and EyeOne Display-2.
Andrew Rodney
http://www.digitaldog.net/
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden