• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Common Standard in UK? Who does the Separations?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Common Standard in UK? Who does the Separations?


  • Subject: Re: Common Standard in UK? Who does the Separations?
  • From: "Richard Frederickson [Contr]" <email@hidden>
  • Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:02:43 -0500

Thanks for the lead and the warning. Primary blue has a nasty habit of turning purple in CMYK and that's my major concern with these images. The ECI ISO webcoated sounds like the safest way to go, especially if it's endorsed by the UK Periodical Publishers Association.

Richard


On 10 Jan 2007, at 15:46, Richard Frederickson [Contr] wrote:


I am submitting composited figures to a scientific journal and they have requested RGB files. Not a problem except that the images are primary Red, Green, and Blue and they won't reproduce well in print without some intervention. When I inquired about their ICC profile for conversion to CMYK, they just responded that it "is not really relevant"--which has me scared since someone has to do the conversion and I'm afraid that they're not likely to take much care doing it.

Hi Richard,

Probably the safest bet is to use the ECI ISO webcoated profile available at www.eci.org

This is the profile recommended by the UK Periodical Publishers Association as 'generic' solution. It has a TAC of 300% which makes it a safer bet than the ECI ISO coated and the Adobe Europe ISO Coated FOGRA 27 profile which have far higher maximum ink limit (although some of the high end glossy magazines will of course be able to tolerate higher TAC than 300% )

A word of warning though , the ECI profiles produce a distinct shift towards purple when converting saturated blues using the relative rendering intent ( kind of relevant to another thread running on this list at present :-) ), so you'll probably be safer using perceptual rendering , albeit it at the possible loss of some saturation in certain areas. And of course these profiles have a set level of GCR.

If you build your own profiles , it might be advantageous to use the relevant FOGRA data and set a TAC of 320% that still falls within the PPA spec for many publications , and use a level of black generation more suitable to your subject matter.

Regards,

Bob Marchant.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


References: 
 >Common Standard in UK? Who does the Separations? (From: "Richard Frederickson [Contr]" <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Common Standard in UK? Who does the Separations? (From: Bob Marchant <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Common Standard in UK? Who does the Separations?
  • Next by Date: (no subject)
  • Previous by thread: Re: Common Standard in UK? Who does the Separations?
  • Next by thread: (no subject)
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread