• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: linearization - luminance, chroma or density?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: linearization - luminance, chroma or density?


  • Subject: Re: linearization - luminance, chroma or density?
  • From: Mike Strickler <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 14:10:25 -0800



1) Hue Hooks: Most inkjet inks will experience a hue hook at higher ink
lay down levels. It's not uncommon to see 20 degrees of hue shift from
70% to 100%. ICC profiles perform much better in environments where
there's little hue shifting. Quite often, the last 20-40 percent of ink
will increase density and look darker to your eye but will actually have
minimal or an adverse effect on chroma/saturation, the parameter you're
really trying to maximize. As others have commented, the key is to get
the maximum saturation with the least amount of ink and then have the
profile add K to achieve darker colors.

Not necessarily. If the object is proofing, the objective is to limit the inks so as to just encompass the gamut of the simulated output. In the case of 4-color offset the limits may be set far below the point where significant hue shifts occur. This may partially explain why for 4-color press proofing purposes density linearizations seem to perform about as well other types. Obviously the situation shifts when proofing presses with extra channels.

3) Total Ink Limit: Most RIPs perform best if you're not overly
aggressive with the Total Ink Limit (TIL). I get nervous when I need to
drop TIL below 200. Appropriate per-channel limiting helps keep TIL in
the desired range.


Usually does, especially when printing on coated papers. Notable exceptions are uncoated papers and textiles, in which case the TIL is extremely low while per channel limits must be kept high enough to achieve acceptable saturation.

Incidentally, the tools we've used to perform this kind of analysis are
X-Rite's Colorport (for generating the CMYKRGB patches, free download)
and Colorshop X (I'm sure Colorthink could do the graphing, too).

In this regard I like the ink limiting in EFI/Best Colorproof, which shows the resulting gamut of the proofer as compared with the simulated device and even let's the user slightly enlarge or reduce the proofer's gamut.



_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


  • Prev by Date: Re: linearization - luminance, chroma or density?
  • Next by Date: ink consumption
  • Previous by thread: RE: linearization - luminance, chroma or density?
  • Next by thread: Re: linearization - luminance, chroma or density?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread