Lists

Terms and Conditions
Lists hosted on this site
Email the Postmaster
Tips for posting to public mailing lists

Re: Eizo monitors and Off-Set Soft-Proofing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Eizo monitors and Off-Set Soft-Proofing

Subject: Re: Eizo monitors and Off-Set Soft-Proofing
From: Martin Orpen <email@hidden>
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 15:44:13 +0000

On 26 Jan 2007, at 15:33, Vanita Cyril wrote:

Sorry Martin, but the CG210s were not built to match AdobeRGB 1998.

Does that mean that they are better or worse than the CG221 at matching offset presses?

And I don't count SWOP certification as proof of anything ;-)

Even the Apple displays can pass a SWOP certification and yet we haven't managed to get one of our many 23" Cinema Displays to get anywhere close to passing the Ugra certification.

--
Martin Orpen
<http://www.idea-digital.com/>

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


Follow-Ups:

Re: Eizo monitors and Off-Set Soft-Proofing
From: Karl Koch <email@hidden>
Re: Eizo monitors and Off-Set Soft-Proofing
From: Andrew Rodney <email@hidden>
Re: Eizo monitors and Off-Set Soft-Proofing
From: Vanita Cyril <email@hidden>


References:  
  >Eizo monitors and Off-Set Soft-Proofing (From: Derek Cooper <email@hidden>)
  >Re: Eizo monitors and Off-Set Soft-Proofing (From: Martin Orpen <email@hidden>)
  >Re: Eizo monitors and Off-Set Soft-Proofing (From: Vanita Cyril <email@hidden>)




Prev by Date:
Re: Legacy Proofing

Next by Date:
Re: Eizo monitors and Off-Set Soft-Proofing

Previous by thread:
Re: Eizo monitors and Off-Set Soft-Proofing

Next by thread:
Re: Eizo monitors and Off-Set Soft-Proofing

Index(es):

Date
Thread