Re: Apple/Adobe Imaging, DAM and Workflow
Re: Apple/Adobe Imaging, DAM and Workflow
- Subject: Re: Apple/Adobe Imaging, DAM and Workflow
- From: PID Jmail <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 14:23:43 -0500
- Thread-topic: Apple/Adobe Imaging, DAM and Workflow
Thanks for your comments Jan-Peter. Most of what you discussed was over my
head, but I gather the intent - there is seemingly much that Apple could do
to make it an even more compelling platform for graphic arts and it does not
even need to be products that directly compete with other companies. I've
read these kind of comments many times while lurking on this list, but I do
not have the knowledge, experience or background to know if they are valid
requests and if they are feasible things for Apple to do. What you say seems
to make a lot of sense from the standpoint that it would be in Apple's best
interest to provide high-end functionality in the OS itself to its (I would
presume) fairly large graphics art customer base.
In regards to the sarcasm at the beginning of the post...
> But it seems, that the graphics arts market is not
> interesting anymore to Apple...
I sense your frustration with something that probably seems so obvious and
yet so totally out of your control, but it tends to tinge your otherwise
thoughtful suggestions.
--
Aj
> From: Jan-Peter Homann <email@hidden>
> Reply-To: <email@hidden>
> Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 20:23:36 +0200
> Subject: Re: Apple/Adobe Imaging, DAM and Workflow
>
> Hello list, hello AJ
> It is tragic to see how powerful Core image is, and how small Apple´s
> understanding of colormanagement is.
>
> Several colormanagement experts have asked Apple for years to implement
> functionalities necessary for the professional users in the graphic arts.
>
> If Apple would do this...
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden