Re: About that red sweater
Re: About that red sweater
- Subject: Re: About that red sweater
- From: email@hidden
- Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 12:00:02 EDT
My approach is in principle quite simple. But its optimized for my particular
workflow with a custom plugin (my wife does plugins) so its hardly general
purpose or a commercial solution. Starting with fundamental camera
characterization data (spectral sensitivities, linearity, etc.) and combining with image
meta data (white point, exposure information, etc.) and image statistics I
calculate an image-specific profile optimized for each unique scene that estimates
the scene appearance (not colorimetry). This happens on open and the profile
is created dynamically, embedded, and assigned automatically so the user (me)
never need be concerned with profiling matters. The first time I see the image
in Photoshop its an appearance estimate of the original scene and I can
control the rendering to output from there. In my experience, the better the
appearance estimate, the less manual rendering required for output.
<<Ask Eric Walowit who reads the list. His solution makes the most sense of
any I've heard to date. But its NOT treating a digital camera like a
scanner, that's for sure.
Andrew Rodney>>
**************************************
Get a sneak peak of the
all-new AOL at http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden