Re: Apple/Adobe Imaging, DAM and Workflow
Re: Apple/Adobe Imaging, DAM and Workflow
- Subject: Re: Apple/Adobe Imaging, DAM and Workflow
- From: Andrew Rodney <email@hidden>
- Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 19:19:42 -0600
- Thread-topic: Apple/Adobe Imaging, DAM and Workflow
On 7/15/07 5:45 PM, "Martin Orpen" wrote:
> English is a complex language Andrew - words have more than one
> meaning and "selling" something doesn't mean that you necessarily
> expect payment in cash for it.
Selling:
n : the exchange of goods for an agreed sum of money [syn:
merchandising,
marketing]
> And my view of people tacitly prostituting themselves is as dim as my
> view of infomercials being passed off as white papers...
Whatever... You points thus far, as far as I'm concerned are mostly negative
and nasty, immature and without merit.
> I'd think twice if you consider my "bluntness" to be a sign of
> "stupidity".
Stupidity? No. Ill informed and without standing, so far yes.
> Deploring Adobe's position on RF sales, UK pricing policy and
> marketing techniques doesn't require me to remove every product that
> they are associated with from my computers.
Therefore the alternative is what?
> You should decide what it is that you actually do.
I have.
> I have serious doubts that your own image making accounts for a
> significant proportion of your income - so don't be surprised that I
> take your views on these issues with a large pinch of salt.
Today, my income doesn't account from any image creation. That wasn't the
case for about two decades. So what? My images still has enormous value to
me.
> I've got no problem arguing that you're wrong - but I do find it odd
> that my independent views put me on a knife edge of being banned from
> here and yet your partisan views are wholly acceptable.
I have no role in your banning here. If you are banned, its probably because
you are ill behaved and don't express your points without being petty and
nasty. In a public forum, its usually considered impolite to call people you
don't agree with a bitch.
We may disagree, but as yet, I've not been personally malicious, something I
suggest you try. I don't know you personally, I have no personal baggage to
offload to this list. You on the other hand apparently do. I don't know your
age or experience in discussing issues in which you may disagree with others
so I'll just have to assume, you are either young, ill mannered or
inexperienced in discussing your opinions publicly with those you disagree
with.
I'm sure you have some valid points to make. But the message is clouded in
anger and poor behavior. The only person you hurt in doing this is yourself.
We can agree to disagree. That's OK with me since I'm not the one who
continues to hurl insults which I'll add is probably necessary due to you
inability to express meaningful argumentation. Perhaps its a method to draw
attention to yourself. I would suggest this isn't a good tactic.
I think we're done here. Until you grow up and behave yourself, I don't see
any point in responding to you. IF you wish to continue the discussion and
act like an adult, I'm more than willing to listen to your salient points on
the subject.
Andrew Rodney
http://www.digitaldog.net/
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden