Re: Apple/Adobe Imaging, DAM and Workflow
Re: Apple/Adobe Imaging, DAM and Workflow
- Subject: Re: Apple/Adobe Imaging, DAM and Workflow
- From: "edmund ronald" <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 14:07:04 +0200
Jack,
As far as I'm concerned, everything goes except personal attacks. If
the guy's positions displease you, and he reiterates them, you're free
to hammer them down again :)
As far as I'm concerned, Andrew is a first rate and knowledgeable
exponent of the state of the art as it is commercially practiced.
While I greatly respect his point of view regarding print profiles, I
happen to disagree with him on camera profiling and Raw workflows, a
topic of which I have some experience both as a consultant and as a
photographer. However I find that discussions with Andrew serve very
usefully to hone the arguments with which to convince others.
Last, not least, if some topics keep coming back again and again, and
elicit such strong responses, it means that they are really of concern
to the community and will not go away after personal scores have been
settled. These image format issues will continue to fester until
consumers send a strong message that formats should be open. Wasn't it
a huge benefit to the camera industry that every camera could take 135
film, and every lab could develop it ?
Edmund
On 7/16/07, Jack Bingham <email@hidden> wrote:
Now this is what I'd call accurate! It is unfortunate to be having
these kinds of discussions on forums like this. It's also unfortunate
that this particular type of discussion has taken place on several
forums I have spent time on and used to contribute to.
>
> "As a longtime lurker i've witnessed the same "tactics" of the
> omnipresent
> "supercontributer" Andrew R. over and over again:
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden