Re: Mac Book Pro display
Re: Mac Book Pro display
- Subject: Re: Mac Book Pro display
- From: Matt Beals <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 16:42:29 -0700
- Thread-topic: Mac Book Pro display
No, no, no... It wouldn't be for color critical work. Just "if I have to
pick one, which one is less bad?". I'd like to have "reasonably accurate"
but I don't do color correction professionally. I do adjust pictures I take
with my Sony DSC-W7 but again it's nothing critical. The most I would be
doing is cast removal. I don't even do much in the way of soft proofing or
PDF proofing on screen.
I guess that the consensus is the matte display.
Matt Beals
Consultant
Enfocus Certified Trainer
Markzware Recognized Trainer
(206) 201-2320 - Main
(720) 367-3869 - eFax
mailto:email@hidden
Come visit me at:
http://www.automatetheworkflow.com
http://www.mattbeals.com
http://blog.mattbeals.com
Friends don't let friends write HTML email
> From: Marco Ugolini <email@hidden>
> Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 16:12:25 -0700
> To: ColorSync Users Mailing List <email@hidden>
> Conversation: Mac Book Pro display
> Subject: Re: Mac Book Pro display
>
> In a message dated 7/31/07 3:02 PM, Matt Beals wrote:
>
>> When looking at color on a MacBook Pro which is "better", "lesser of two
>> evils",etc, the matte display or the glossy display?
>
>
> My vote is for the matte surface, hands down.
>
> Still, as another person has noted, the MacBook Pro display is *not*
> advisable for critical color work, whether it's glossy or matte.
>
> Marco Ugolini
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>
> This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden