• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Mac Book Pro display
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Mac Book Pro display


  • Subject: Re: Mac Book Pro display
  • From: Nov06 <email@hidden>
  • Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 02:18:02 +0200

This is only very indirectly answering the question of matte vs. glossy, but here is a comprehensive review of the MacBook Pro from a photographers perspective:
http://www.robgalbraith.com/bins/content_page.asp?cid=7-8741-9027


On 01.08.2007, at 01:42, Matt Beals wrote:

No, no, no... It wouldn't be for color critical work. Just "if I have to
pick one, which one is less bad?". I'd like to have "reasonably accurate"
but I don't do color correction professionally. I do adjust pictures I take
with my Sony DSC-W7 but again it's nothing critical. The most I would be
doing is cast removal. I don't even do much in the way of soft proofing or
PDF proofing on screen.


I guess that the consensus is the matte display.

_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: This email sent to email@hidden
References: 
 >Re: Mac Book Pro display (From: Matt Beals <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Mac Book Pro display
  • Next by Date: Re: UV Filter - DTP70/Spectrocam
  • Previous by thread: Re: Mac Book Pro display
  • Next by thread: Re: Mac Book Pro display
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread