• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: EyeOne Accuracy for FOGRA Proof Verification
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: EyeOne Accuracy for FOGRA Proof Verification


  • Subject: Re: EyeOne Accuracy for FOGRA Proof Verification
  • From: Joseph Yates <email@hidden>
  • Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 01:05:07 -1000

On 6/9/07 4:57 AM, "Roger Breton" <email@hidden> wrote:

> My experience with the EyeOne is that the Diagnostics is good for catching
> fundamental flaws in the instrument like failing reflectance calibration.
> But it won't detect calibration inaccuracy or drift.
>
Good to know. So how does one check for inaccuracy or drift for these
measuring devices?

> As for its repeatability, it is not as good as, say, the Spectrolino but it
> should be no worse than most X-Rite's instruments.
>
Do you know what kind of tolerance most X-Rite¹s are capable of (especially
EyeOne)?
>
> The fact that you are on the border of failing the Media Wedge tolerance
> (4.6 to 5.4) may tell you that you're too close to the limit for comfort?
>
True ­ but as I stated these measurements are from a Xerox Phaser laser
printer (actually three of them) ­
and am not really trying to use the results as high end verified ISO proofs.
(Have an Epson 9800 & ORIS ColorTuner for that purpose)
Rather seeing if I can use the  Media Wedge (and ORIS Certified Proof &
EyeOne) to color control all three laser printers.
My reasoning being if all 3 printers (after PhaserMatch calibration &
Profiling) can pass the ISO FOGRA verification -
to as tight a tolerance as one can expect a 4 color CMYK toner based printer
to come ­ and then remain consistent & repeatable amongst all 3 printers ­
I will have a gauge in place to evaluate when to re-calibrate & re-profile.

So far the results are promising ­
Paper DeltaEs are 1.5 ­ 2 (FOGRA <3)
Avg, DeltaEs are 2.5 ­ 3 (FOGRA <4)
Maximum DeltaEs are 6-7 (FOGRA <10)
Primaries DeltaEs are 4.5 ­ 5 (FOGRA <5)

The Primary patch that is most off is usually Cyan ­ could just be that this
is as close as I can hope this particular Xerox cyan toner will get to
matching the FOGRA tolerance.
Of course I know these tolerances should be (and can be!) much tighter for
other proofing systems ­ but for my purpose they are acceptable.

So knowing the limits and accuracy of the EyeOne instrument will help in
setting tolerances

Joseph Yates  |  Pacifica Island Art  |  Maui, Hawaii


>
>
>  _______________________________________________
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
> .com
>
> This email sent to email@hidden



 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: EyeOne Accuracy for FOGRA Proof Verification
      • From: Roger Breton <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: EyeOne Accuracy for FOGRA Proof Verification (From: Roger Breton <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Subject: Re: EyeOne Accuracy for FOGRA Proof Verification
  • Next by Date: Re: Subject: Re: EyeOne Accuracy for FOGRA Proof Verification
  • Previous by thread: Re: EyeOne Accuracy for FOGRA Proof Verification
  • Next by thread: Re: EyeOne Accuracy for FOGRA Proof Verification
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread