• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: ColorBurst RIP
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ColorBurst RIP


  • Subject: Re: ColorBurst RIP
  • From: Karsten Schwarze <email@hidden>
  • Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 08:10:50 +0200
  • Thread-topic: ColorBurst RIP

Hi Marco,

If you take a look at version 5.1 that was released a couple months ago, you
will find a new "expert mode" in the preferences that gives the user back
control over the features you mentioned.

The fact that Colorburst used a UV cut spectro for building their
linearizations and profile is not limiting you to use a non uv cut spectro
when building you linearizations and profiles.


Regards,
Karsten.



Am 15.06.2007 7:54 Uhr schrieb "Marco Ugolini" unter
<email@hidden>:

> In a message dated 6/11/07 7:40 AM, Vanita Cyril wrote:
>
>> We are currently running 2 copies of the ColorBurst RIP from two
>> different macs. I really haven't had any issues with ColorBurst.
>
> I do have an issue with the choice ColorBurst made a few years back to cut
> off access to printer features like print resolution, ink type, etc. (this
> refers to the Macintosh version -- I have no idea if the same also applies
> to the Windows version), and to make these features available only by
> starting off using one of their pre-baked profiles.
>
> I find that awkward and somewhat indifferent to a professionally-minded way
> of working. (The explanation I got from a company representative was
> something along the lines that it's friendlier to the user this way...not
> the professional user, I suspect.)
>
> Also, another debatable choice was to require a UV-cut spectrophotometer for
> the linearization procedure, without offering the option to use one that is
> not UV-cut. Personally I don't have a UV-cut spectro, so I find this
> limitation irritating.
>
> (Puzzling choice, that one: you would think that the same user who would
> love the "friendlier" interface would also not be sophisticated enough to
> think of buying a UV-cut spectro.)
>
> Marco Ugolini
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>
e
>
> This email sent to email@hidden
>


Viele Grüße aus der Altmark,
Karsten Schwarze

___________________
Colorklinik
color consulting


Karsten Schwarze
Hauptstr. 99
39615 Krüden

fon: 039386-75 647
fax: 039386-75 648

email@hidden
http://www.colorklinik.de


 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: ColorBurst RIP
      • From: Marco Ugolini <email@hidden>
References: 
 >ColorBurst RIP (From: Marco Ugolini <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: ColorBurst RIP
  • Next by Date: Re: ColorBurst RIP
  • Previous by thread: ColorBurst RIP
  • Next by thread: Re: ColorBurst RIP
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread