• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Lightbox - Screen Matches
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Lightbox - Screen Matches


  • Subject: Re: Lightbox - Screen Matches
  • From: Andrew Rodney <email@hidden>
  • Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 10:05:31 -0600
  • Thread-topic: Lightbox - Screen Matches

On 6/18/07 9:45 AM, "Fleisher, Ken"  wrote:

> Nothing. I'm talking about screen-to-transparency matching, which I think I
> was pretty clear about.

Why would I care unless I'm running a film recorder and my final output is
another piece of film?

> That may be true, but it doesn't change the fact the I still have to produce
> screen-to-transparency matches daily!

Why? The transparency has to be scanned, there most likely has to be some
editing (in scanner driver or Photoshop) to produce a closer output referred
rendering based first on the display, then to some final output. Again, if
the final output is another chrome, what you want to do makes sense. If the
final is some printed piece, the chrome is just a single part of the imaging
process that is really immaterial now that you've scanned it and its in the
computer. What's the final output you want to match to the screen?

The chrome is no more accurate (colorimetrically) with respect to the scene
than any other part of the process required to produce some final output
that is supposed to represent the scene on a different media. IOW, you
always have to take the final output into consideration.

In theory, there's no reason you couldn't slap the chrome on a box with a
dimmer and match it (assuming the box could get to the necessary luminance
along with your display).

> Is there a replacement for it? As far as I understand it, this is basically
> still the current spec and the standard viewing conditions haven't really
> changed.

I don't believe it's been updated. It could use that considering where the
technology has gone since first proposed.

Andrew Rodney
http://www.digitaldog.net/


 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Lightbox - Screen Matches
      • From: "Fleisher, Ken" <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: Lightbox - Screen Matches (From: "Fleisher, Ken" <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: question on LED-backlit displays
  • Next by Date: Re: question on LED-backlit displays
  • Previous by thread: Re: Lightbox - Screen Matches
  • Next by thread: Re: Lightbox - Screen Matches
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread