Re: Ooops - D65 != D65 ???
Re: Ooops - D65 != D65 ???
- Subject: Re: Ooops - D65 != D65 ???
- From: Andrew Rodney <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 13:01:04 -0600
- Thread-topic: Ooops - D65 != D65 ???
On 6/15/07 7:37 PM, "Uli Zappe" wrote:
> Now, I'm aware that (speaking in terms of an xyY chromaticity chart)
> there's many different possible (x,y) combinations to produce a 6500
> K whitepoint, but somehow I would have thought that a D65 whitepoint
> is an unambiguous standard that defines one of the possible
> combinations as a standard.
That would be nice (and useful) but I too haven't seen this to be the case.
Its been many years since I did such a comparison however. It would be
interesting to see if you can measure the native white point by all devices
and software products (that is an option in some packages).
I always set LCD's for Native anyway.
The definition of a D50 white point is pretty darn non ambiguous, I'd agree.
What each package is actually able to produce is or course quite a different
story here.
> One additional remark: I was amazed that even in the expensive Eye-
> One Pro package, the software is nothing more than a black box that
> somehow produces a profile. There's no way to access the and work
> with the physical measurement data at all. Is this generally the case
> with this kind of products
Make sure you choose the Advance options in the wizard (at the beginning).
Andrew Rodney
http://www.digitaldog.net/
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden