Re: Ooops - D65 != D65 ???
Re: Ooops - D65 != D65 ???
- Subject: Re: Ooops - D65 != D65 ???
- From: Uli Zappe <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 04:25:53 +0200
Am 19.06.2007 um 03:16 schrieb Graeme Gill:
This is really an ICC problem. There has always been "ambiguity"
about a display profiles white point [...]
Thanks a lot for this instructive history!
Robin Myers inspired me to look at the settings of the apps I used,
and it turned out that both the Eye-One and the ColorVision software
were set to v2.
Changing the setting to v4 had no immediately visible influence on
the generated Eye-One profile, i.e. the profile still, and now
explicitly against the v4 spec, uses "lumi" to store the whitepoint
settings. ColorVision's software, in contrast, modified its profile
to conform to the v4 spec: "wtpt" now contains 0,9642-1,0000-0,8249,
just as the spec demands (and Eye-One already did for v2 profiles),
and there's an additional "chad" (chromatic adaptation) entry that
contains a matrix which obviously transforms the configured
whitepoint to D50; so this is obviously ColorVision's new (and
seemingly correct) place to store whitepoint data.
The actual issue of different D65 whitepoints is not getting closer
to being fixed with the v4 setting, however.
Bye
Uli
________________________________________________________
Uli Zappe, Solmsstraße 5, D-65189 Wiesbaden, Germany
http://www.ritual.org
Fon: +49-700-ULIZAPPE
Fax: +49-700-ZAPPEFAX
________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden