Re: Ooops - D65 != D65 ???
Re: Ooops - D65 != D65 ???
- Subject: Re: Ooops - D65 != D65 ???
- From: Graeme Gill <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 00:31:28 +1000
Andrew Rodney wrote:
Yes if we agree that the value are based on the blackbody definition of a
kelvin value but how many devices can produce these exact, not correlated
values?
All of them presumably. It would be a fairly useless calibration that
didn't target a specific white point, but instead brought the display
to some random point at a target correlated temperature.
So it sounds like what you're saying is, no matter what scale you use,
you're not getting it in reality so it doesn't matter what they are based
upon?
No I was pointing out that you were comparing apples to oranges,
so naturally they are different. The significant difference is between
color temperature and correlated color temperature, not between black
body and daylight.
Graeme Gill.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden