Lists

Terms and Conditions
Lists hosted on this site
Email the Postmaster
Tips for posting to public mailing lists

Re: SWOP proof standards

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: SWOP proof standards

Subject: Re: SWOP proof standards
From: Lorenzo Ridolfi <email@hidden>
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 22:16:25 -0300

IMHO, the ink limits for the C, M and Y inks should be in the "linear part" of the curve, excluding the "hook" part at the end of the curve (plotted in *a, *b). In terms of K, the ink limit should correspond to the SWOP density, 1.61.

Am I correct ?

Best regards,
Lorenzo

Marco Ugolini wrote:


ICC-profile-based proofing (if that is what we are referring to here) is after a colorimetric match. It's not the densities that one is trying to match.

Ink densities are close to irrelevant. Linearity and ink limiting are more important than ink densities per se.

Marco Ugolini

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden



References:  
  >Re: SWOP proof standards (From: Marco Ugolini <email@hidden>)




Prev by Date:
Re: U.S. Web Coated (SWOP) v2 always produces blues that shift?

Next by Date:
Safe CMYK ?

Previous by thread:
Re: SWOP proof standards

Next by thread:
Safe CMYK ?

Index(es):

Date
Thread