Re: difference hp Z2100 and Z3100- now PL fo B&W
Re: difference hp Z2100 and Z3100- now PL fo B&W
- Subject: Re: difference hp Z2100 and Z3100- now PL fo B&W
- From: Marco Ugolini <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 00:06:23 -0700
In a message dated 3/20/07 10:18 AM, Tyler Boley wrote:
>> From: Marco Ugolini <email@hidden>
>> Subject: Re: difference hp Z2100 and Z3100- now PL fo B&W
>> ...
>> To compare photographic RC paper to Epson Premium Luster
>> strikes me as unfair.
>
> this is about fairness now? For choices fine artists make?
Reality check for all "fine artists" (or "artistes"), please: as I thought I
had made clear (though someone seems not to be reading my messages through
in their hurry to reach a preconceived conclusion...), I am emphatically
*not* advising that Premium Luster be used by "fine artists" (whatever that
may mean to any one person -- and though some actually do). I'm trying to
make a wider point about being aware of choices for a wide range of users.
>> ...Premium Luster is a perfectly defensible choice of paper for many
>> uses -- though not for museum or high-quality gallery exhibits.
>
> So, obviously then, not for the fine art B&W, which is what this was all
> about.
Yes...so? With all the background noise, I am missing the point you're
trying to make -- and failing to see where it is that we're supposed to be
disagreeing...
> Good grief.
What's good about it?
Marco Ugolini
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden