• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Huey on the Xl20 and some other comments.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Huey on the Xl20 and some other comments.


  • Subject: Huey on the Xl20 and some other comments.
  • From: tom lianza <email@hidden>
  • Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 05:15:32 -0500

Hi to All,


Graeme Gill was correct about the Huey on the XL20. This product was carefully tested on the XL line of products and it is tuned for this application. I think the XL product line also can be bundled with specially tuned i1Displays in certain markets/regions. I can assure you that the decision to bundle Huey wasn't made by some marketing wonk. A significant amount of testing went into their decision. New test stations were designed specifically for this technology. They (Samsung) also invested a fair amount of effort in the software. I have never used the software , so I can't comment on it. The display is quite good and it is generally representative of the state of the art in their technology.


I use a Samsung 243T panel at home. This product had a brief life, but it is very good for viewing static images. It's response time was too slow for the gamers, so they introduced the 244 with a much shorter response time. This had the unfortunate side effect of lowering the useful field of view and introducing the negative characteristics that people tend to associate with PVA (variable, asymetric contrast ratio with viewing angle and position) and increasing cost. I don't think many readers of this list understand the level of compromise that needs to be made in panel design. Many of the engineering factors that work towards a better static display have very negative impact on displays that need to work well with full motion images. The market size for the graphic arts /photography is quite small relative to the general purpose market, so you really don't have many people concentrating on building the perfect panel the photographer/graphic artist. The internal pipe lines are also getting complex because of dual link DVI and HDMI formatting and of course, Digital Rights Management. This is all being driven by HD video. Many of the next generation displays will have Picture in Picture capablity where you can show live video on your screen from a second input. Few if any of these features are desirable for the folks on this list and they drive the cost of the display up exponentially due to the bandwidth required for these pipelines. The end result : panels optimized for still imaging will be more expensive, harder to get, and the image quality for collaborative viewing will probably suffer. Vendors such as Eizo and Quato will have to hunt very carefully for suitable OEM panels and the supply chain will be chaotic.

The DDC situation is simply out of control on all levels: the displays, the graphic cards, and the operating systems. There are a host of new commands that offer, in my opinion, dubious advantages to the consumer and introduce quantum jumps in software complexity. On the other hand, with luts or gamma control in the display, we don't have to worry about all the graphic card idiosyncrasies. The problem is that uploading all this data to the display is time consuming using the ddc channel on the graphic cards, hence the shift towards USB links (like Eizo pioneered). This situation complicates third party software significantly due to the support issues. We now must have software that has to utilize adaptive strategies based upon the available control set, host interface, and the manner in which those controls will operate. This is going to put a strain on many of the smaller developers out there. As you can hear in the frustration of some of the solution providers on this forum, the channel conflict between vendor supplied solutions and VAR supplied solutions is getting worse. Over the next year, this situation will worsen. Over the next year, we will see more vendor supplied solutions that don't play nicely with other vendor solutions. That situation is not going to sort itself out anytime soon. Getting two displays to look the same that come from different vendors, is going to be harder to do in the upcoming year.

I get to see most displays before they hit the market and I can tell you that there will be some great displays hitting the market next year, but don't expect them to be cheap and don't expect them to play nicely with one another.... I'm sure the comments on this list will be quite active.

Take care
Tom Lianza
Director of Video and Motion Picture Technology
X-rite


_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: This email sent to email@hidden
  • Prev by Date: Re: Eye One Pro for monitor calibration? [was: Re: NEC 2690 SpectraView]
  • Next by Date: Re: Spectraview Software and Gamut Question
  • Previous by thread: Re: Eizo CG241W vs. NEC 2690 SpectraView - It'll be Eizo for me
  • Next by thread: Re: Huey on the Xl20 and some other comments.
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread