Re: Neutral grey under different lighting
Re: Neutral grey under different lighting
- Subject: Re: Neutral grey under different lighting
- From: Scott Martin <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 17:47:33 -0500
On Sep 3, 2007, at 3:40 PM, Roger Breton wrote:
At issue, it seems to me, is ... the perception of a "single sample"
changing in appearance as viewed under two or more light sources.
On Sep 3, 2007, at 3:51 PM, Andrew Rodney wrote:
So if I'm understanding some off list comments, they have to look
the same
in order for us to use the term metamerism. When they don't look
the same,
that's metamerism failure (anit-metamerism if you will).
OK, I think you are both onto something. Let's exaggerate the
situation for a moment. Let's say we are dealing with a print made
with an early pigmented inkjetset - say with an Epson 9500. Is it
fair to say that prints made from such an inkjet are likely to have
metamerism failure when compared to prints from newer inkjet printers?
I previously said "Fuji Crystal Archive and Kodak Endura are
surprisingly susceptible to metamerism." Perhaps I should have said,
"Prints made from on Crystal Archive and Endura are more likely to
have metamerism failure than other photo papers when compared to
other types of prints." I'm sure someone can rewrite this line more
eloquently than I. Feel free to do so.
Scott Martin
www.on-sight.com
P.S. other random words heard over the years: metachromatism,
metachromatic shifting, metachromatic inconsistancy, antimetamerism
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden