Re: CMYK is CMYK is CMYK (again)
Re: CMYK is CMYK is CMYK (again)
- Subject: Re: CMYK is CMYK is CMYK (again)
- From: Louis Dery <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2008 21:27:33 -0400
Roger,
GRACOL are NOT printing sepcifications but a METHOD to meet the ISO
specs.
Flexo, silk-screen or nay… to aim the SAME CIELab values as SWOP and
GRACOL? Are you serious!
FTA is supporting the G7 method, NOT matching the CIELab value of
offset ink… I hope!
Louis
On Apr 1, 2008, at 9:17 PM, Roger Breton wrote:
GATF / SWOP / GRACOL are standards for offset printing. Flexo is
not offset.
mo
GATF is not a standard. But I sense that you know that isn't
either. SWOP
and GRACoL are printing specifications for web and sheetfed offset
respectively. And there is nothing that prevents flexo, silk-screen
or any
other print process to aim for the same CIELab values as SWOP and
GRACoL. As
a matter of fact, the FTA has embraced the G7 method and encourages
his
members to print to the GRACoL2006 numbers.
Sure, flexo is not offset.
Roger Breton
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
40tglc.com
This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden