• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Legacy Gamma 1,8 in Mac apps
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Legacy Gamma 1,8 in Mac apps


  • Subject: Re: Legacy Gamma 1,8 in Mac apps
  • From: Koch Karl <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 22:54:14 +0200

Hi Ray,

I admit my wording wasn´t perfectly scientific ;-)
If you perform the little test I mentioned, you will see for yourself – best to be seen in the shadows because that´s where sRGB differs most from gamma 2.2. If you don´t have one, I can send you a "simplified sRGB" that has a real gamma 2.2 for comparison. Or you can make one yourself with SpaceLab (download from www.basiccolor.de).


Best regards,

Karl



Am 22.04.2008 um 19:52 schrieb Ray Maxwell:
Hi Karl,

I am not sure what "not even close" means. It probably means something like a "match" with no tolerance specified in any kind of units.

I always refer to Bruce Lindbloom's site on the subject:

http://www.brucelindbloom.com/

Click on "Info" and then "Information About RGB Working Spaces". At the bottom of the page is a full discussion on sRGB. You will notice in his table that he says the gamma is approximately gamma 2.2.

Ray

Koch Karl wrote:
I fully agree with the suggestion to make the system tonal response curve selectable. At the same time Apple could reestablish the option to select a system CMM like in OS X 10.3 – this could go into the same preferences panel. Since not every application allows for selecting a CMM (e.g. Quark) this would make Macs much more usable in their target market "graphic arts".

One more thing on gammas: sRGB is NOT gamma 2.2, not even close! You can easily see that when you assign sRGB to an image and the change to a simplified sRGB like the one Photoshop (before 7) created when saving the sRGB profile to file.

Best regards,

Karl Koch
basICColor GmbH



Am 22.04.2008 um 13:14 schrieb Roger Breton:
Jan-Peter,

I agree with you 100%: they owe it to their users to abandon 1.8.

Roger Breton

It is the choice of Apple to serve the professional imaging community
and also the digital imaging prosumers by implementing international
standard for digital imaging correctly or to mess up their customers by
forcing them to a legacy Gamma of 1,8



Regards Jan-Peter




_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden

_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: This email sent to email@hidden
References: 
 >Re: Legacy Gamma 1,8 in Mac apps (From: Roger Breton <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Legacy Gamma 1,8 in Mac apps (From: Koch Karl <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Legacy Gamma 1,8 in Mac apps (From: Ray Maxwell <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: ISO 12647-7 "tolerances"
  • Next by Date: Re: Spectro #'s vs PS #'s
  • Previous by thread: Re: Legacy Gamma 1,8 in Mac apps
  • Next by thread: Re: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 5, Issue 133
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread