Re: GRACoL & SWOP Tolernaces
Re: GRACoL & SWOP Tolernaces
- Subject: Re: GRACoL & SWOP Tolernaces
- From: Derek Lambert <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 09:43:39 -0400
Uli,
How about i1 Display 2? Did you have a chance to compare it also?
Derek Lambert
On Apr 25, 2008, at 7:10 AM, Uli Zappe wrote:
Personally, I had 3 instruments each at my disposal of the following
models: i1Pro, i1 Display and Spyder2. I only had 1 Spyder 3 as this
was released only shortly before the end of the test runs, 2 DTP94
as these are becoming rare, and 1 huey pro (as I figured that would
be sufficient).
That being said, here are the results:
Device scaled scaled
deltaE deltaE
mean max
DTP94 0.47 0.67
i1 Pro 0.56 0.75
Spyder 3 0.74 1.33
huey 1.19 2.80
Spyder 2 1.56 3.18
i1 Display 1.89 5.34
Some remarks: the i1 Display devices performed horrible; I would
consider them pretty much unusable for any serious task. There's not
even decent repeatability (especially after 6 months) or inter-
instrument agreement. Why X-Rite stopped the DTP94 (the best
performing instrument of all) in favor of the i1 Display after the
merger with GMG is completely beyond me.
------------------------------------------------
Derek Lambert
Director of PrePress Services,
Color and Information Technologies
Litho-Art Inc.
175 Varick Street
New York, Ny 10014
T.212-242-7650 x.116
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden