Re: Colour management and photographers - another perspective.
Re: Colour management and photographers - another perspective.
- Subject: Re: Colour management and photographers - another perspective.
- From: Roger Breton <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 10:44:09 -0400
> For example, if the additional effort is 400% and the gain is quantifiable
> at, say, 1 or 2%, it may very well not be worth it, specially if it's only
> measurable by instruments, but it's not meaningfully perceivable by more
> than just one observer. We all have to draw the line somewhere.
>
> Marco Ugolini
Interestingly, what would be the criteria for deciding when the optimal
patch count has been reached, can any generalizations be made about that?
Using some kind of dE metrics, I suppose? Or wouldn't it be more seminal to
try to characterize the output device in terms of its degree of monotonicity
and, therefore, deduce some kind of optimal patch count from this behavior?
I know that IDEAlliance has begun a process of looking into "the degree to
which of a given output system (press, mainly) can ever successfully adopt
the G7 method" -- in other words, they are asking : is a given press capable
of acceptable G7 behavior? Implying that some presses or processes are in
such bad shape or pure shamble that any rational efforts at forcing a G7
bahavior on them is doom to failure.
Nice research topic.
Roger Breton
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden