Re: The DDC situation
Re: The DDC situation
- Subject: Re: The DDC situation
- From: Marco Ugolini <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 16:42:35 -0800
- Thread-topic: The DDC situation
In a message dated 12/22/08 12:04 PM, edmund ronald wrote:
> What this repeated breaking of *working* CMS really demonstrates is
> that the ICC is incapable of creating a test-suite for testing
> non-regression and interoperability, preferring fingerpointing instead
> as a modus vivendi. As an ICC member I find this extremely sad.
Is it really up to the ICC to do that? What can they do if the companies
that produce hardware and software don't express any interest in full and
tested "interoperability" with their *competitors*?
Why should these companies feel obligated to make any but the most token
efforts to "get along" when the whole point of being in the game is to best
your opponent and get *their* share of the business?
Mark Segal's suggestion is valid: it would make far better sense instead to
move towards establishing a standards committee for this particular process,
then. In all fairness, the industry can *not* be expected to do it of its
own initiative.
Marco
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden