Re: The DDC situation
Re: The DDC situation
- Subject: Re: The DDC situation
- From: "edmund ronald" <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 03:02:45 +0100
The geeks are well represented at the ICC. Just about everyone there
is more technical than me. And geeks have a tendency to like stuff
that works. I think it's time said committee concentrated a bit more
on making sure the user gets RELIABLE, REPEATABLE managed color,
rather than expending engineering time on demonstrating the very
questionable advantages of V4 vs V2 workflows.
Edmund
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 1:42 AM, Marco Ugolini <email@hidden> wrote:
> In a message dated 12/22/08 12:04 PM, edmund ronald wrote:
> Is it really up to the ICC to do that? What can they do if the companies
> that produce hardware and software don't express any interest in full and
> tested "interoperability" with their *competitors*?
>
> Why should these companies feel obligated to make any but the most token
> efforts to "get along" when the whole point of being in the game is to best
> your opponent and get *their* share of the business?
>
> Mark Segal's suggestion is valid: it would make far better sense instead to
> move towards establishing a standards committee for this particular process,
> then. In all fairness, the industry can *not* be expected to do it of its
> own initiative.
>
> Marco
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>
> This email sent to email@hidden
>
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden