• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: The DDC situation
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: The DDC situation


  • Subject: Re: The DDC situation
  • From: MARK SEGAL <email@hidden>
  • Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 18:10:13 -0800 (PST)

And what mandate does the ICC have to work on the DDC problem? What expertise specialized in that niche do they have to manage such a process? What resources would they need to do it, and how would they obtain those resources, from who, and what authbority would they carry-over into implementation given the size and diversity of the target industry components? One advances by recommending options that have some prospect of operationa signifigance, hence my questions to test this proposal.

Mark




________________________________
From: edmund ronald <email@hidden>
To: Marco Ugolini <email@hidden>
Cc: ColorSync Users Mailing List <email@hidden>
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2008 9:02:45 PM
Subject: Re: The DDC situation

The geeks are well represented at the ICC. Just about everyone there
is more technical than me. And geeks have a tendency to like stuff
that works. I think it's time said committee concentrated a bit more
on making sure the user gets RELIABLE, REPEATABLE managed color,
rather than expending engineering time on demonstrating the very
questionable advantages of V4 vs V2 workflows.

Edmund

On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 1:42 AM, Marco Ugolini <email@hidden> wrote:
> In a message dated 12/22/08 12:04 PM, edmund ronald wrote:
> Is it really up to the ICC to do that? What can they do if the companies
> that produce hardware and software don't express any interest in full and
> tested "interoperability" with their *competitors*?
>
> Why should these companies feel obligated to make any but the most token
> efforts to "get along" when the whole point of being in the game is to best
> your opponent and get *their* share of the business?
>
> Mark Segal's suggestion is valid: it would make far better sense instead to
> move towards establishing a standards committee for this particular process,
> then. In all fairness, the industry can *not* be expected to do it of its
> own initiative.
>
> Marco
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>
> This email sent to email@hidden
>
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: The DDC situation
      • From: "edmund ronald" <email@hidden>
  • Prev by Date: Re: The DDC situation
  • Next by Date: Color casts when printing
  • Previous by thread: Re: The DDC situation
  • Next by thread: Re: The DDC situation
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread