• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Densitometers and Spectrophotometers
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Densitometers and Spectrophotometers


  • Subject: Re: Densitometers and Spectrophotometers
  • From: Dan Wilson <email@hidden>
  • Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 09:33:33 +0000
  • Thread-topic: Densitometers and Spectrophotometers

Hi Peter,

In a crude explanation, I find it easier to think of Densitometers as black
and white instruments. Inside the densitometer a different colour filter is
put in front of the lens/light when you want to read different colours -
each different filter makes a colour look like black.

For instance, if you got some old red Rubylith film and looked at a Coke
bottle the red and white on the label would largely disappear. If you then
look through the Ruby film at something cyan it would look black. So using
the filters the Densitometer reads the 'blackness' or density of the target
relative to the paper.

Spectros on the other hand read all the wave lengths of light - they are
'full colour' devices. Then smart people on this forum get the paper white
value, the read target value, and apply some fancy maths formula to
calculate the density.

It is also possible to calculate TVI (or Dot Gain) with a Spectro - I think
the ISO should adopt this method as it removes the 'relative-ness' (if that
is a word) of using Densitometers to calculate TVI.

Below is a sample of the data a Spectro collects.

Regards,


Dan Wilson
--
G7 Certified Expert
UGRA Certified Expert/Consultant
--
Prepress I.T. Limited
Dublin, Ireland
Dublin +353 (0)85768 2733
www.prepress-it.com

**************************************************
SAMPLE_ID    CMYK_C    CMYK_M    CMYK_Y    CMYK_K    LAB_L    LAB_A    LAB_B
SPECTRAL_400    SPECTRAL_410    SPECTRAL_420    SPECTRAL_430    SPECTRAL_440
SPECTRAL_450    SPECTRAL_460    SPECTRAL_470    SPECTRAL_480    SPECTRAL_490
SPECTRAL_500    SPECTRAL_510    SPECTRAL_520    SPECTRAL_530    SPECTRAL_540
SPECTRAL_550    SPECTRAL_560    SPECTRAL_570    SPECTRAL_580    SPECTRAL_590
SPECTRAL_600    SPECTRAL_610    SPECTRAL_620    SPECTRAL_630    SPECTRAL_640
SPECTRAL_650    SPECTRAL_660    SPECTRAL_670    SPECTRAL_680    SPECTRAL_690
SPECTRAL_700

END_DATA_FORMAT

NUMBER_OF_SETS    275

BEGIN_DATA

1    100    100    100    0
27.36826    0.7248735    2.337503    3.95595
4.856588    5.058892    4.761323    4.455005
4.37118        4.53157        4.196051    4.072113
**************************************************

> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 18:13:13 EST
> From: email@hidden
> Subject: Re: Densitometers and Spectrophotometers
> To: email@hidden, email@hidden
> Cc: email@hidden
> Message-ID: <email@hidden>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
>
>
> In a message dated 08/02/2008 23:09:52 GMT Standard Time,
> email@hidden writes:
>
> I am not  as happy with the repeatability of the Eye-One as I was with a
> high end  densitometer.
>
>
> Matk sorry to butt in here - but doesn't a spectro calculate density
> differently than a densitometer - or is that just an old wives tale
>
> peter
>
> ------------------------------


 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

  • Prev by Date: Re: RIPs v Epson driver
  • Next by Date: Re: RIps v. Epson driver
  • Previous by thread: Re: Densitometers and Spectrophotometers
  • Next by thread: RIps v. Epson driver
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread