• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: monitor/colorimeter bundles
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: monitor/colorimeter bundles


  • Subject: Re: monitor/colorimeter bundles
  • From: Robin Myers <email@hidden>
  • Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 06:04:18 -0800


On Feb 15, 2008, at 3:27 AM, Roger Breton wrote:

Hmm. Which instruments are "like the i1" in this regard? Does that
include the Spectrolino?

Good question. I'll admit I never tested the Spectrolino in this regard.
Maybe someone else could comment? Until I find the time to try it,
personnally, that is, I wouldn't know. Maybe Mr. Myers has had some
experience with using the Spectrolino in emissive mode and could comment?
Mr. Myers has extensively wrote sofware for the 'Lino -- and the EyeOnePro,
too, of course.


Roger Breton


It has been many years since I used the Spectrolino for monitor measurement and I do not remember how it fared with dim measurements.

For emissive lighting measurements I have run more recent studies. Because since it does not have a cosine corrector, known as the ambient filter with the i1 Pro, it is extremely sensitive to the instrument's angle relative to the light source. Cosine correctors also act as attenuators and without one the Spectrolino's sensor can be easily over saturated. For that reason I use the i1 Pro in a special rig I constructed to make emissive lighting measurements.

Back to monitor measurements. Whichever device you use for monitor measurements, the usual way to get better data with dim signals is to increase the integration time until a satisfactory signal to noise ratio is achieved. This brings the signal above the shot noise (the noise due to the random nature of light). There is a penalty for this, the dark current noise is increased.

Before each set of emissive measurements the instrument will have the user perform a calibration. For the i1 Pro this is accomplished in one of two ways; for monitor measurements (without the ambient filter) the calibration is performed by placing the instrument on the white tile, for lighting measurements the calibration involves leaving the cap on the ambient filter. In both cases the instrument's internal light source is not activated, so the calibration is measuring the steady state dark current noise, which will be subtracted from subsequent measurements.

As the instrument is used for making monitor or lighting measurements, the dark current noise level can change from the calibrated amount. A number of factors can cause this; heat from electronics, monitor heat, ambient room temperature changes, air moving over the instrument, etcetera. This means that the more measurements made after the calibration, the more likely the dark current value will change from the calibrated amount, thus more error will appear in the dimmer patch values.

There are ways to lessen this creeping error. Thermal chilling units can be used inside the spectrometer to keep the sensor at a constant temperature. A Photo Research PR-703 I used for several years had this device. It also had a drying agent to remove the moisture condensing from the chiller. The cost was also much higher than readers of this list would pay.

Why a chiller and not a constant temperature heating element? The reason is that the ability to detect small light amounts is increased if the dark current noise is reduced. Astronomers use chillers for their telescope sensors for just this reason. Sometimes resorting to more exotic chilling methods such as liquid nitrogen.

Another way to lessen the dark current error would be to put a shutter into the instrument and make a new dark current calibraton before each emissive measurement. This would make monitor calibration a very slow process. However, if the instrument is warming up considerably during the monitor measuring sequence, this would lessen the dark current error but the instrument might not be able to detect the dim monitor signal.

A simpler method would be to put most of the dim patch measurement as soon as possible after the dark calibration. I have not paid close attention to the sequences used for calibrating monitors, but this seems like a reasonable compromise.

There are other ways to improve the dim measurements that come to mind, but I need to dash off now.

Robin Myers
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: monitor/colorimeter bundles
      • From: Roger Breton <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: monitor/colorimeter bundles (From: Roger Breton <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: monitor/colorimeter bundles
  • Next by Date: Re: monitor/colorimeter bundles
  • Previous by thread: Re: monitor/colorimeter bundles
  • Next by thread: Re: monitor/colorimeter bundles
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread