• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Photoshop Gamut warning vs ColorThink
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Photoshop Gamut warning vs ColorThink


  • Subject: Re: Photoshop Gamut warning vs ColorThink
  • From: Roger Breton <email@hidden>
  • Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 22:05:47 -0500

Seems like kind of contradictory? You say the net effet is to map color as
though is was saturation yet the ICC likes to call it "perceptual".

> The reference gamut is great if you like saturation rendering,
> not much good if you want perceptual though.
> (The implications of the ICC requirements that the
>   A2B table gamut mapping be the inverse of the B2A
>   gamut mapping imply that the mapping be a saturation one.)
>
> Graeme Gill.

Roger Breton


 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Photoshop Gamut warning vs ColorThink
      • From: Graeme Gill <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: Photoshop Gamut warning vs ColorThink (From: Graeme Gill <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Photoshop Gamut warning vs ColorThink
  • Next by Date: Re: Photoshop Gamut warning vs ColorThink
  • Previous by thread: Re: Photoshop Gamut warning vs ColorThink
  • Next by thread: Re: Photoshop Gamut warning vs ColorThink
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread