• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Photoshop Gamut warning vs ColorThink
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Photoshop Gamut warning vs ColorThink


  • Subject: Re: Photoshop Gamut warning vs ColorThink
  • From: Graeme Gill <email@hidden>
  • Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 13:49:10 +1100

Chris Cox wrote:

Yes, the ICC has figured a few things out -- which is why the V4 perceptual
intent specifies a reference gamut instead of maintaining the fiction that
perceptual intent would map all of LAB into the target gamut.

The reference gamut is great if you like saturation rendering, not much good if you want perceptual though. (The implications of the ICC requirements that the A2B table gamut mapping be the inverse of the B2A gamut mapping imply that the mapping be a saturation one.)

Graeme Gill.

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Photoshop Gamut warning vs ColorThink
      • From: Roger Breton <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: Photoshop Gamut warning vs ColorThink (From: Chris Cox <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Photoshop Gamut warning vs ColorThink
  • Next by Date: Re: Photoshop Gamut warning vs ColorThink
  • Previous by thread: Re: Photoshop Gamut warning vs ColorThink
  • Next by thread: Re: Photoshop Gamut warning vs ColorThink
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread