• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Photoshop Gamut warning vs ColorThink
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Photoshop Gamut warning vs ColorThink


  • Subject: Re: Photoshop Gamut warning vs ColorThink
  • From: Graeme Gill <email@hidden>
  • Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 13:46:13 +1100

Andrew Rodney wrote:

disappeared. Our output profiles do the mapping for us better and faster
and, we have a soft proof to show us this (within the confines of the
display gamut). I see this as simply a legacy option and Adobe doesn't like
to ever remove anything no matter how few people use it (despite the cries
that the application is too complicated and bloated).

This is true only if the output profile was created specifically for that particular image, or specifically for the source colorspace you are using. Not many systems work like that. Most profiles are created without any knowledge of the source gamut they are mapping from.

Graeme Gill.

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


References: 
 >Re: Photoshop Gamut warning vs ColorThink (From: Andrew Rodney <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Photoshop Gamut warning vs ColorThink
  • Next by Date: Re: Photoshop Gamut warning vs ColorThink
  • Previous by thread: Re: Photoshop Gamut warning vs ColorThink
  • Next by thread: Re: Photoshop Gamut warning vs ColorThink
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread