Re: U.S. Web Coated (SWOP)v2 vs. SWOP2006_Coated5v2
Re: U.S. Web Coated (SWOP)v2 vs. SWOP2006_Coated5v2
- Subject: Re: U.S. Web Coated (SWOP)v2 vs. SWOP2006_Coated5v2
- From: Roger Breton <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 19:44:50 -0500
> Just thinking about this one.... back when TR-001 was done
> Were they CTP ?
Film, for sure. This was 1995 after all. Don't recall whether that's
documented in the TR-001 report itself.
> That combined with the G7 NPDC curves could certainly
> Produce a profile that wouldn't Kill your shadow detail nearly as
> Much as the old Web SWOPV2 profile.
One could argue, though, that G7 killed print contrast. With printers
concentrating on achieving the holy grail of gray tone aims, who's to say
how well presses are able to hold good shadow detail now?
> I would like to think that The newer presses would print better than they
> did 10 years ago too
I'm sure they do too, irregardless of calibration approach.
Roger Breton
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden