• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Inkjet Ink restrictions
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Inkjet Ink restrictions


  • Subject: Re: Inkjet Ink restrictions
  • From: "john castronovo" <email@hidden>
  • Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2008 23:16:41 -0400

Agreed, but to be fair, it's much easier to profile RGB devices where every color can only be made by using a single recipe. CMYK devices have a much more complicated and fickle model and the new inkjets using seven channels are proving to be extremely difficult to profile.


----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark Rice"
Unfortunately, I see a strange split in the inkjet world. Almost no
manufacturers make RIPs - it is left to 3rd party RIP manufacturers. So I
doubt that HP is going to convince Onyx to give something up. The RIP
manufacturers, strangely, seem to have no interest in resolving this "art"
of creating initial ink restrictions as the base for creating a profile.
It's all done by eyeball, with predictably unpredictable results.


I would like to see a method of generating initial ink restrictions based on
density values and some form of gray balance throughout the linearization
range. This would be somewhat difficult, as different materials have
different ink absorption and drying characteristics. But some research by
those REALLY SMART GUYS could figure out an algorithm, I believe.


In the photographic world of the Lambda and Lightjet, Fuji and Kodak publish
aim point densities for their different photographic materials. There are
specified photographic density aim points for every step on the scale. The
RIP then does the best job it can to achieve these target densities. This
has several added benefits:
1. It means that ICC profiles generated on one machine will work on another
machine.
2. It means that one can re-linearize without changing the target densities,
thus eliminating the need to re-characterize.
3. It means that nearly all machines in the world are calibrated to a nearly
identical standard, and can print the same image nearly identically. A
linearization on an inkjet machine will typically create green-cyan shadows,
and magenta highlights. A linearization on a Lambda will create a nearly
perfect gray scale throughout the range!
4. It means that if you have 3 Lambdas or Lighjets in your working
environment, one can be substituted for the other with nearly no color
change.


Those four points seem to be a big workflow incentive! Now how can we get
RIP makers to work on it?

_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: This email sent to email@hidden
References: 
 >Inkjet Ink restrictions (From: "Mark Rice" <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Inkjet Ink restrictions (From: Roger Breton <email@hidden>)
 >RE: Inkjet Ink restrictions (From: "Mark Rice" <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: CM rant
  • Next by Date: Re: CM rant
  • Previous by thread: RE: Inkjet Ink restrictions
  • Next by thread: RE: Inkjet Ink restrictions
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread